Open Software License 3.0
Copyleft that also applies when the software is offered over a network (like AGPL). Changes you offer as a service must be made available.
Verify with a lawyer. This is guidance, not legal advice. Check with a lawyer before deciding.
What the licence means per use case
The verdict applies to the licence family (Network copyleft (AGPL)). An individual product can have its own terms; you get the full per-product analysis when you sign in. Confidence: high.
| Use case | Verdict | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| U1 Self-hosted, internal use, unmodified | Allowed | Free to run internally, unmodified. |
| U2 Self-hosted and modified | Conditions apply | If you modify it and users (employees too) reach it over a network, offer them your modified source. |
| U3 Novro hosts it for you (single-tenant) | Allowed | Unmodified is OK. Modified: the source must be offered to users. |
| U4 Shared multi-tenant instance | Conditions apply | As above; changes must be offered to all users. |
| U5 In your cloud, managed by Novro | Allowed | As GPL plus the network clause. |
| U6 Redistribution (builds, images, appliances) | Conditions apply | The whole work's source must be provided. |
| U7 Commercial use | Allowed | Commercial use is allowed. |
| U8 AI acceptable use (AUP, EU AI Act) | Not applicable | Not applicable to this licence type. |
Building on it: what may you do?
Short answers based on the licence, for the version in the catalog.
- B1 Change the code for internal use in your company Yes, with conditions Yes, but if staff or others reach it over a network they must be able to get your modified source.
- B2 Build your own product or service on top and offer it to customers as SaaS Yes, with conditions Yes, but you must share your changes with the users (AGPL).
- B3 Make a closed-source derivative and sell or distribute it No No. The derivative must carry the same licence and the source must be offered.
- B4 Use the project's name and trademark No No, not without permission. The licence covers the code, not the name or logo.
This is guidance, not legal advice. Check with a lawyer before deciding.
Common pitfalls
- Network clause: running a modified version as a service for others counts as distribution.
- Incompatible with the GPL. Don't mix OSL and GPL code in one work.
- The licence covers the code, not the trademark. Don't use the project's name or logo in a way that suggests an official product.
The licence text
- Read the official licence text
- SPDX register: OSL-3.0
- More about the family: Network copyleft (AGPL)
Last reviewed:
Products in the catalog under OSL-3.0
This is guidance, not legal advice. Check with a lawyer before deciding.